Home Uncategorized Trump’s Demand for US Cut of a TikTok Deal Is Unprecedented

Trump’s Demand for US Cut of a TikTok Deal Is Unprecedented

President Donald Trump’s demand that the US authorities get a minimize from a potential Microsoft buy of TikTok is the most recent unprecedented state of affairs in an unprecedented scenario.

Microsoft is in talks to purchase components of TikTok, a compelled sale after Trump threatened to ban the Chinese-owned video app, which claims 100 million US customers and tons of of hundreds of thousands globally. The Trump administration says TikTok is a national-security concern. How a ban would have labored was not clear; that federal authority has by no means been used earlier than with a client app. TikTok denies that it will ship US person information to the Chinese authorities.

Microsoft didn’t handle a potential value when it confirmed the talks.

Trump on Monday advised reporters that the US “should get a very large percentage of that value as a result of we’re making it doable,” adding that “we want and we think we deserve to have a big percentage of that price coming to America, coming to the Treasury.”

Trump sometimes floats ideas or actions that get set aside without follow-through. Appearing on the Fox Business Network Tuesday, White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow appeared to walk back the idea of a payment to the Treasury, saying “I don’t know if that’s a key stipulation.”

TikTok was under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, known as CFIUS, a US government group chaired by the Treasury Secretary that studies mergers for national-security reasons, for its acquisition of another video app, Musical.ly, in 2017. The president can approve or disapprove a transaction recommended by the interagency panel. CFIUS collects filing fees, but those top out at $300,000 (roughly Rs. 2.2 crores).

“I doubt that’s what Trump has in mind,” said Hal Singer, an antitrust expert and managing director at consulting firm Econ One. “Outside of that I can’t think of any means by which the US could basically get its vig on its forced transfer.” A “vig” is slang for interest on a loan, usually in the context of illegal activity, or the fee charged by a bookie for a bet.

There’s no legal precedent in antitrust law for such a payment, said Gene Kimmelman, a senior adviser at the advocacy group Public Knowledge and a former antitrust official at the Department of Justice. “In terms of a foreign company agreeing to sell assets to a US company subject to antitrust review, I can’t see any logical basis under which Treasury or the White House would be negotiating elements of the financial portions of the deal.”

While noting that he is not an expert in all areas of US law and the broad authority that the president has, he said the TikTok deal and the White House’s role in it was highly unusual. “Not in my experience have I seen any engagement from the White House in this manner,” he said. “It’s already a unique situation from start to finish with the government intervening to prevent use of a service in the US.”

There are no “obvious antitrust or other legal bases” for the demand for “what is in effect a payoff to the US government,” said Eswar Prassad, an economist at Cornell University. “The notion of a payment to the US government sets a dangerous precedent of explicit entanglement between national security and economic considerations.”

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany sidestepped a question Tuesday about what authority the federal government had to collect a portion of proceeds from the potential sale of TikTok, saying “I’m not going to get ahead of the president on any official action.”

Treasury did not reply to questions about what legal precedent Trump is relying on to get a payment for the TikTok deal.

In a statement Sunday, Microsoft had said that that it was committed to the deal “subject to a complete security review and providing proper economic benefits to the United States, including the United States Treasury.”

TikTok has said that it is loved by Americans and “will be here for many years to come.” In a memo ByteDance CEO Zhang Yiming sent Chinese employees Tuesday, a translated version of which ByteDance sent to The Associated Press, he stated that he felt the purpose of the Trump administration was not the compelled sale of TikTok’s US enterprise to an American firm by means of CFIUS, however “a ban or even more.”

A consultant for Microsoft didn’t reply to questions concerning the cost demand Tuesday. TikTok declined to remark past its Monday assertion.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here